Comments on: SIP softphone? https://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:38:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: /pd https://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/comment-page-1/#comment-19455 Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:38:02 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/#comment-19455 Thanks Rich , I just need a confirm,.
I was not sure if you had posted on twitter or if you had blogged it.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/comment-page-1/#comment-19336 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:13:29 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/#comment-19336 pd: Because I used the word “lazyweb”, apparently. It struck me as a little odd that they’re grabbing “lazyweb” as well as “hoosgot” to import, but it’s not worth chasing down. Unfortunately, it kind of makes Hoosgot come across as yet another content-grabbing splog, so I kind of hope they reconsider on the “lazyweb” side.

]]>
By: /pd https://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/comment-page-1/#comment-19335 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:00:49 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/#comment-19335 Hi Rich, I wonder if you could clue me in- on how this entry got into Hoosgot ??

http://www.hoosgot.com/index.php/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/

]]>
By: Drew https://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/comment-page-1/#comment-19331 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:08:22 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/#comment-19331 We use both X-Lite and Eyebeam at work… Eyebeam is really only useful for if you want to be able to transfer calls. X-Lite is pretty good.

]]>
By: scromp https://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/comment-page-1/#comment-19329 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:12:38 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2008/01/31/sip-softphone/#comment-19329 “decent” could be argued from a UI perspective, but X-Lite works, or an X-Pro variant if you can score one (they seem about the same to me.) It’s what Vonage provides, and it works with Asterisk and all that other jazz.

]]>