Comments on: business cards https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:17:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: Andrina https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-7476 Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:17:23 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-7476 When I had to do my own business cards I did my own design and got these guys to print them for me – http://www.overnightprints.com

They’re based in the US, but quite competitive price-wise – I had 250 cards made and shipped for just over $40.

The other nice feature I got from these guys was a UV coating on both sides – it essentially is a near-plastic coating for the card that gives is a bit more weight and a nice smooth finish – makes the card last longer also. There’s pros and cons to this – you can keep them in your wallet and they always look pristine, you can hand them to someone in a bar and after someone spilt beer on them you can just wipe it off and it’s as good as new. The con being of course, that if someone wants to write a note on the flip-side, they’ll need a sharpie to do so!

Looking at my receipt from a couple years ago from these guys, it seems like you can chose to get the UV coating only on one side – I went for both sides though and it worked out just fine for me.

Good luck with everything!
A

]]>
By: MNC https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6517 Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:49:14 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-6517 To save on cost, try http://www.ooprint.com

You can upload your design directly to their business cards!

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5937 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:34:03 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5937 Philip: Yeah, definitely. I don’t like the underscore at all. At e-smith we all had three addresses: first_last, first.last, and our Unix usernames, which were freely chosen but couldn’t be completely arbitrary. Most people used first name and last initial, although some used three initials, and a couple (including Skud) used their nicknames.

]]>
By: Philip Newton https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5910 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:41 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5910 Not related to your current card, but rather to your “boring corporate” one — I always thought that the firstname_lastname@example.com format looked ugly, and much preferred firstname.lastname@example.com (with dot instead of underscore).

Fortunately, the company I’m working at uses firstname.lastname (as well as TLA@example.com, using your “Kürzel”, a [usually three-letter] abbreviation that you use as your login).

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5890 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:36:03 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5890 sporetobemore: Hrm, pattern. Might be interesting. I only have those two colors to work with though without it getting more expensive, though. As to size: Self-promotion at a convention is a different story than MBA recruiting. The only message a non-standard card size would send is “This person doesn’t realize that business cards are a standard size”. Sort of like not wearing a dark suit to an interview or not printing a resume on white paper.

gcrumb: Spot color! :-)

]]>
By: gcrumb https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5888 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:11:02 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5888 WRT the ‘@’: You’ve probably heard the story about the Emperor’s Vase, in which a priceless vase is broken, and the top craftsman of the Middle Kingdom is commissioned to make it exactly as it was before. Realising the futility of the task, the craftsman filled all the cracks with gold, making the vase more beautiful than before.

This story was told to me by a theatre prof of mine, trying to explain how to deal with the imperfections inherent in any creation.

I suspect that the answer might be more ‘@’ rather than less. If you superimpose the ‘h’ and the ‘l’ over a backgrounded (and faded?) symbol, you can set it apart from the rest of the text, in effect accentuating the difference.

… Or you could just draw your own, as you suggested. 8^)

]]>
By: sporetobemore https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5880 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:22:59 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5880 I like it. I would go with the orange on the other side, but maybe not just flat orange? I can see a simple pattern looking nice on it, even if it was just in one corner. Maybe on that side you could include your details once again in the other corner. I think some people might not realize that your name is Rich Lafferty because of the way it’s written, so doubling up on the details in the more typical way might combat that. Then again, maybe that’s just repeatative and since you’ll be handing them out personally, I doubt confusion will arise regarding your name very often =P

Almost completely unrelated but I met this woman at the convention I went to recently and we were discussing business cards. Because she works at conventions regularly and there are so many business cards being passed out, she really wanted to stand out so she actually had a card holder made that measures maybe 5×3″. It also opened like a formal card; this way it appears to people that it might actually hold something more, like promotions or free offers, and they’re more likely to hold onto it and check it out once home (especially swag collectors), while it’s also less likely to get lost in a pile of business cards.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5879 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:06:48 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5879 gcrumb: I hate that @. It’s actually the @ from the normal-width part of the family, because the condensed @ is wider. And yes, it’s italicised, but even better it’s got a single-story “a” even though the font has a nice curvy double-story “a”. I might just build my own @ out of the “a”. (I might also just suck it up.)

Oh, hey, you know what it is? The kerning around the “.” is crap too. I’ll fix both ends.

Pam: I’m really a lowercase sort of guy. The only problem with the descender was in that draft with the blocks of color, though, it’s fine in the final one.

Helvetica was a very specific choice — before I knew anything about what I was doing on the card I knew it was going to be set in Helvetica, and Neue is a nice update to prevent it from looking too retro. I’m not a big fan of humanists for logotype.

(Besides, the only company that can get away with Myriad on a business card right now is Apple. It’s so tightly tied with them right now that it might as well have been commissioned. It ought to be dead to the rest of the world for logotype now, but it’s everywhere anyhow.)

]]>
By: Pam https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5872 Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:51:34 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5872 What about doing the name/email all in capitals? That would get rid of the descender, though not sure how it would change the feel of the card itself. Also, I like Helvetica, but I’m kind of currently in love with Myriad Pro Regular.

]]>
By: gcrumb https://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-5848 Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:26:33 +0000 http://www.lafferty.ca/2007/07/18/business-cards/#comment-5848 Whoops! Took a proper look, and it’s because the ‘a’ part actually is italicised.

]]>