Comments on: Kiki Winchester’s lawyer threatens legal action about year-old post

By: Rich

Rich — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:02:41 +0000

(Curiously, the previous two comments came from an Ottawa-based IP address who found this page via a Google search for the lawyer’s name. Disemvoweling was my doing.)

By: Your Mother

Your Mother — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:15:38 +0000

bhhh sck my ss

By: Your Mother

Your Mother — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:15:06 +0000

Ww, ths s fckng gy nd y gys r fckng dts tht hv n fckng lf.. hhhhh

By: Rich

Rich — Fri, 18 May 2007 23:52:12 +0000

Also she misplets "lawyer" in her FAQ. Hah! As for the googlebombing, while I'm usually a fan of such things, I've had such weird issues with Google lately that it's probably not a great idea.

By: Paul Tomblin

Paul Tomblin — Fri, 18 May 2007 20:11:36 +0000

You want to see funny? Go to the lawyers web site – http://heaphylaw.com/about.html

It’s 90% “loren ipsum” filler.

By: Paul Tomblin

Paul Tomblin — Fri, 18 May 2007 18:01:57 +0000

Maybe I’m just a bastard at heart, but I think we should all put links to your previous article about her in our blogs so that it gets a better Google rating.

By: Rich

Rich — Fri, 18 May 2007 17:48:47 +0000

Wow, Google’s quick! It’s only been an hour or two since I posted.

And yeah, I’m certainly not taking it down because they told me to. (I almost wrote “asked me to”, but that’s not really asking, is it? Although it’s funny — if Kiki had called or emailed to tell me what the problem was, the resulting conversation probably would have been much more productive.)

By: Bill Bradford

Bill Bradford — Fri, 18 May 2007 17:45:20 +0000

I notice that this post is now the third Google result for “kiki winchester” :)

By: Bill Bradford

Bill Bradford — Fri, 18 May 2007 17:44:05 +0000

I may be mistaken on this, but is email even accepted/recognized as a proper channel for legal communications nowdays?

I take it (and hope) that you’re not going to remove the original post?

By: Hannah

Hannah — Fri, 18 May 2007 16:53:23 +0000

I got a cease and desist recently for an old post in lj_support made by pthalo that I can’t even edit (i don’t have posting access to lj_support) for something which was hardly defamatory. the person in question sent it from “dont_bother_replying@[server].com”, so I didn’t bother replying to tell them that I didn’t have the ability (or desire) to comply. whatever.