Comments on: Mail::Audit https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/05/21/mailaudit/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Fri, 21 May 2004 13:54:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: anonymous https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/05/21/mailaudit/comment-page-1/#comment-1196 Fri, 21 May 2004 13:54:00 +0000 #comment-1196 I decided not to use procmail ages ago. I don’t think I got heavily into Mail::Audit, but my filter makes heavy use of Mail::Header (I think Mail::Audit is also by Graham Barr).

Let me know if you want a copy.

Peter S

]]> By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/05/21/mailaudit/comment-page-1/#comment-1195 Fri, 21 May 2004 13:47:04 +0000 #comment-1195 It’s funny, because I said that for a long time, but then I realized: Yes, for simple things, procmail is easier to pick up than perl, but HEY WAIT I ALREADY KNOW PERL!!1! and then it all made sense. The clue that I should move was the number of little perl scripts that procmail called.

]]> By: gerg https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/05/21/mailaudit/comment-page-1/#comment-1194 Fri, 21 May 2004 13:36:44 +0000 #comment-1194 But I already know all the obscure procmail syntax!

I don’t want to learn a whole other language for mail processing. PROCMAIL 4 LYFE!

]]>